Faculty form two groups to oversee
handbook policies
By Heather McCutcheon,
The Herald Staff
Members of Arkansas State University Faculty Senate voted
Friday to form two new committees, both to address recent discrepancies
with the Faculty Handbook.
According to Dr. Richard Wang, associate professor of political
science, the purpose of the Reapportionment Committee will be
to examine and revise the current method of faculty reapportionment,
and report back to the senate with proposals for reapportionment
for spring 2002.
The process of reapportionment involves counting the number
of faculty receiving university contracts from each college,
and using that number to determine how many senator seats will
be available to each college.
Due to problems with the current method of reapportionment
in the Faculty Handbook, the faculty senate voted at the April
6 meeting to keep the number of senator seats available to each
college at status quo with the exception of one additional seat
for the College of Communications.
Jeff Bailey, Faculty Senate chair, told The Herald at that
time the decision to keep the number of senate seats the same
was made because of confusion in how to count certain faculty
members.
According to Bailey, this confusion was caused by discrepancies
in the terminology used in the Faculty Handbook, which made the
current method of reapportionment uncertain.
The Oversight Committee was formed in order to make sure that
all rules stated in the Faculty Handbook are upheld.
Dr. Bill Maynard, associated professor of history, said that
the American Association of University Professors has become
aware of many handbook violations.
"There are people being hired on campus with inappropriate
degrees," Maynard said. The legally binding document is
being repeatedly violated on this campus, he said.
"Since the handbook has become a legal document, these violations
are very serious," Maynard said.
Faculty Senate member Dr. Bill Rowe, professor of art, said
according to his research, it also has been confirmed that a
member of the Physical Plant staff is retiring at age 52, and
still receiving full retirement benefits when the Faculty Handbook
states that in order to receive these benefits, one must retire
at age 55.
"It seems there are different sets of rules for different
people," Rowe said. "It is our obligation to faculty
to go by the handbook, and when we go against it, we set a precedence
that the handbook isn't valid."
"We have to be guardians of this document," Maynard
said.
Senate members also discussed the athletic budget.
Following a request made by senate members at the April 6
meeting, Bailey invited members of administration, including
ASU President Dr. Leslie Wyatt, to meet with the senate Friday
to discuss the Athletic Department's planned use of university
cash reserves. Bailey said that Wyatt and the other members of
administration were unable to attend Friday's meeting.
According to Bailey, the Athletic Department budget report
verifies that the auxiliary reserves used by the Athletic Department
have been depleted. The department will be loaned $1.7 million
from the university cash reserves.
Maynard said the faculty should reexamine at their priorities.
"We've already learned from the finance committee that
the money spent on academics is less than 30 percent, and the
number of faculty is also declining," he said.
Rowe said the university is having difficulty hiring people
because of better salaries offered by competing universities.
"We're hiring people with less credentials to fit a budget
line," Rowe said. "If we're going to be competing on
a PhD level, we need to be hiring the right people."
"If we had half of what the Athletic Department receives,
we would have an outstanding advising center and an outstanding
mentoring program," Dee Layton, instructor in developmental
studies, said.
This money also could go into a health program for faculty,
Maynard said.
"I'm not necessarily saying we shouldn't have athletics
on campus," he said. "It's a question of what it does
to the rest of the campus."
"If we can justify tapping into university cash reserves
for football, then why not for health care and salaries,"
Wang said.
No action was taken regarding this discussion.
In other business, the Faculty Senate:
discussed the results of the Profession Committee's faculty
survey for spring 2001. The committee did not make any specific
recommendations from the survey results.
"We felt the senate could look at the report and see
what options can be pursued," said professions committee
member Dr. Joanna Grymes, associate professor of early childhood
education.
Grymes said the committee made the survey simpler this year
in comparison with past surveys. The survey consisted of four
basic questions and a final question that allowed the faculty
to elaborate on what types of rewards they would make them feel
most valued by the university. Answers to this question varied.
voted to appoint Dr. Richard Freer, assistant professor of
social work, to the University Teaching and Learning Center Board.